Friday, 29 January 2016

Scaling the mountain to principalship: The barriers and the enablers of a female first time principal’s journey - Chapter Ten: Where Janet’s identity and circumstances collided

Chapter Ten: Where Janet’s identity and circumstances collided
Janet needed a change in her self-perception and the concept of her identity to contemplate the journey upwards to principalship but she also needed the circumstances in her life to be right too.
10.1 “It was like, well maybe I could do this” (Janet)
Identity, which is partly self-constructed and partly socially constructed within relationships with people is not singular but multiple, discursive and contradictory and a person may be multi-voiced and take up multiple positions (Bell, 2011; Fuller, 2013).  Identity can also change over time and a person’s choices can be fluid (Lumby, 2009).  
Janet identified herself as a daughter, wife, mother, teacher, dean, assistant principal and then deputy principal in her career life story.  However, she did not see herself as a principal until she was in her 50s even though “in the early days I had always wanted to be a principal … I was cocky young teacher.”  Unfortunately, she was put in “her place very early on” by a variety of people including a senior mistress who told her to get changed at a dance and her first mentor who told her to watch her “ps & qs” as she was “fairly outspoken.”  Janet was also “put off a little bit by being a principal. I don’t really know what put me off or why I changed my mind of being a principal but I really wanted to keep in contact with the kids.”  In England, Oplatka and Tamir (2009) also discovered that the women they interviewed did not want to lose contact with students and this stopped them from choosing to advance towards headship.  Later on in her career as deputy principal Janet said that “I lost my confidence that I could actually be a principal and one of the reasons for that was going to deputy principal conferences, [which were] very heavily male.” Janet could not equate her identity as a woman to her identity as a principal; she did not see herself as having the necessary characteristics to be able to handle such a position at that time which concurs with Fawver’s (2014) literature review on women and leadership.

Wiendling and Dimmock (2006) concluded from their research that acting as the head was a valuable experience for their UK head teachers prior to their first appointment and this was definitely the case for Janet.  For many women identity is linked to confidence (Bosak & Sczesny, 2008; Duncan, 2013) and being the principal for a term increased Janet’s confidence.  This allowed her to psychologically transition from deputy principal to principal-in-the-making.  This confidence, which was partly from her formed positive relationship with the two staunch teachers, enabled Janet to see herself as a principal and believe “well maybe I could do this.”


At the same time as her psychological change there was a collision of circumstances (Lumby, 2009).   Her roles as wife and mother became more flexible when her daughter left home and she felt that she had more time to dedicate to the principal role which is similar to the conclusions of Hansen (2014) and Young and McLeod (2001).  Janet and her husband made a conscious decision that if she became a principal they would just have to get through theirannus horribilis.” They decided that the emphasis would be on Janet’s career and her role and “how that can be supported and that sort of thing.”  Therefore, when a principal position became available in her home town where she had “taught both the parents and their children” she knew that the time was right to apply for it because she felt that she needed to develop her community.

No comments:

Post a Comment